The rational to justify our overweight on Credit markets is still valid from our point of view. Economically, we observed some further signs of improvement in the euro zone: gains in consumer confidence and EMU PMIs better than expected rising to 53.3. From a micro perspective, the Q4 corporate results season has been a good session. The very low yield environment is also a positive driver for Credit markets: the ECB QE has created supply & demand imbalances and therefore a scarcity of high quality assets. American issuers continue to take advantage of this environment by issuing more and more in euro terms to find cheaper financing costs (Chart 3). This phenomenon accounts for 25% of supply since the beginning of the year.

Positive on the non-financial sector
The companies have generally beaten the consensus during their last corporate results. Specifically, non-financial companies are preserving their cash levels and keeping their financial leverage under control. Their Credit metrics are close to those observed in 2006 in core countries but spreads are currently wider. Given the massive asset purchases of the ECB, we are searching attractive spreads on a risk-adjusted basis: we keep overweighting BBB (Chart 4) and peripheral names. Sectorially, we are keeping our overweight mainly on the Utilities, Telecom, Automobile and Industrial sectors but underweighting the Oil & Gas sector, which is suffering from the decline in the oil price and geopolitical turmoil (Petrobras, Gazprom).
We are also going down the capital structure by investing in highquality companies issuing hybrid debts with attractive return perspectives via the primary market.

A more cautious stance on some financial Senior
We continue to overweight the financial sector with a preference for subordinated debts as financial companies continue to gradually reinforce their capital ratios. On the bottom-up side; we are still positioned to benefit from the on-going catch-up of subordinated insurance debt versus subordinated bank debt. We also prefer senior operating debt compared to senior holding debt. The former is more and more scarce while the latter could be impacted by downgrade revisions of Rating Agencies.
The German legislator has suggested to make senior debt a bailinable instrument. As a result, in case of extreme events (default), the senior debt could be more impacted than stated before. Therefore, we preferred to take profit on German senior debt. In a near future, it could be a further source of concern as this proposition could spread to other EMU countries.


Monthly Strategic Insight
Maggiori informazioniRendita fissa
News